- From: Brandon McConnell via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2023 21:37:41 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
@tabatkins > (This does make me lean towards spread2(), fwiw, because making it unambiguously a thing only usable in custom properties probably avoids this sort of confusion with JS's ... operator.) Yeah, I could lean towards option 2 as well, though I think it would help to whitelist certain usages of `spread()` like using it within the `random-item()` function. If we were to employ some kind of list/set function that actually houses lists of args and makes them reusable, then it may be worth discussing my other comment and how such a function could benefit all `random-item()`, `nth()`, and `spread()`. However, I'm not sure if that discussion would be best had here or in another thread. -- GitHub Notification of comment by brandonmcconnell Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8391#issuecomment-1414407410 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 2 February 2023 21:37:43 UTC