- From: CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2023 00:40:52 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
The CSS Working Group just discussed `Web Anim stuff`, and agreed to the following: * `RESOLVED: Publish Web Animations 2 as FPWD, with flackr and Brian as editors` * `RESOLVED: Publish CSS Animations 2 fpwd` <details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary> <TabAtkins> Topic: Web Anim stuff<br> <TabAtkins> flackr: Scroll Animations is depending on a lot of changes in Web Anim 2, to support CSSNumericValues in the API<br> <TabAtkins> flackr: But WA2 isn't ED yet<br> <TabAtkins> flackr: We've been having discussions around that spec for more than a year now. I'd like to move it to ED to get things ready for Scroll Animations<br> <TabAtkins> +1 from me for fpwd<br> <Rossen_> ack fantasai<br> <Zakim> fantasai, you wanted to ask if it should go to FPWD<br> <TabAtkins> fantasai: Fully support ED, it's overdue. Should it be going to fpwd? Is there stuff you think should *not* be in the spec? Or is it all in the direction we want to take?<br> <TabAtkins> flackr: There are many things in the spec not implemented/experimented yet..<br> <TabAtkins> flackr: But I think it's generally in the right direction. Probably just CustomEffects that's not well defined.<br> <TabAtkins> fantasai: Are they in a direction that looks reasonble and could be more well defined?<br> <TabAtkins> flackr: Yes<br> <TabAtkins> fantasai: So yeah then, it's fpwd, that's fine<br> <chrishtr> +1<br> <TabAtkins> Rossen_: Objections for web-animations-2 FPWD?<br> <TabAtkins> Rossen_: Same editors?<br> <TabAtkins> flackr: It has Stephen and Antoine removed. I know Stephen's no longer working on WA, dunno about Antoine. But me and Brian are def in.<br> <TabAtkins> Rossen_: Okay then let's go with you and Brian, we can add more later.<br> <TabAtkins> RESOLVED: Publish Web Animations 2 as FPWD, with flackr and Brian as editors<br> <TabAtkins> fantasai: Do we want fpwd for CSS Animations 2?<br> <TabAtkins> flackr: I'm in support<br> <TabAtkins> Rossen_: Anything there that wouldn't be ready?<br> <TabAtkins> flackr: from my perspective it's solid<br> <TabAtkins> Rossen_: Sounds good, objections?<br> <TabAtkins> RESOLVED: Publish CSS Animations 2 fpwd<br> <TabAtkins> flackr: There's also Transitions 2<br> <TabAtkins> fantasai: Summarize changes?<br> <TabAtkins> flackr: Good question, cant' summarize right now<br> <TabAtkins> fantasai: That's fine, we'll come back to it<br> <TabAtkins> github: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6900<br> <TabAtkins> github-bot, take up https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7664<br> </details> -- GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6900#issuecomment-1412979677 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 2 February 2023 00:40:53 UTC