Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor] Implicit anchors in fallback to enable reuse (#8104)

I still think we should remove it.

As we [only allow one implicit anchor element](https://drafts4.csswg.org/css-anchor-1/#implicit-anchor-element), the `implicit` keyword is already enough.

And I don't think we should ever allow multiple anchor elements defined by multiple specs.

The only concern is that we are now leaving the responsibility of not redefining implicit anchor element to the other specs, which means there will be an inter-connecting dependency between them. But maybe this is not a big issue at such an early stage.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by xiaochengh
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8104#issuecomment-1412921507 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Wednesday, 1 February 2023 23:55:03 UTC