Re: [csswg-drafts] [web-animations-2] Web animations API for specifying timeline phases in animation options. (#7589)

The CSS Working Group just discussed `[web-animations-2] Web animations API for specifying timeline phases in animation options.`, and agreed to the following:

* `RESOLVED: take the api shape int he linked comments and add properties to the animation interface along timeline`

<details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary>
&lt;argyle> astearns: first is about timeline phases, assuming rob is going tot ake this one<br>
&lt;argyle> flackr: lemme make things nice and simple..<br>
&lt;flackr> Proposed resolution in https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7589#issuecomment-1380842759<br>
&lt;argyle> flackr: there's a proposed resolution int eh comment i linked<br>
&lt;ydaniv> s/int eh/in the/<br>
&lt;argyle> flackr: this isadding the ability to the web animations API to specify ranged names and offsets whciih we have already specced for css animations<br>
&lt;argyle> flackr: brian has looked at this proposed and agrees with the current designb, seems fine to add this to the animation options alongside the timeline attribute<br>
&lt;argyle> flackr: this shoudl allow us to control the same thhings from javascript animations<br>
&lt;argyle> flackr: any objections to the proposal?<br>
&lt;argyle> astearns: i'mm looking througgh, we resolved to go with option 2. the propsed shape is?<br>
&lt;astearns> https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7589#issuecomment-1380842759<br>
&lt;argyle> flackr: its all consistentent with the earlier resolution, but it's not going to end delay and start delay because we moved it to it's own property<br>
&lt;argyle> astearns: its in this comment here?<br>
&lt;argyle> astearns: yep, this is it<br>
&lt;argyle> astearns: alright, any opinions, concerns?<br>
&lt;argyle> kevin ellis: moving from timing otpoins to animation options, would no logner be able to update range start/end updating timing<br>
&lt;argyle> kevin ellis: we will need web animation api calls on the a nimation object to be able to get range start/end<br>
&lt;argyle> kevin ellis: do we have a proposal for getter/setter or function for setting animation range programatically?<br>
&lt;argyle> flackr: conventionally we'd do the same thing as animation timeline. getter/setter<br>
&lt;argyle> kevin ellis: i'm in support of that, would like to see resolution<br>
&lt;argyle> flackr: happy to make that part of the resolution<br>
&lt;argyle> astearns: any other comments?<br>
&lt;argyle> astearns: any concern with resolving ono this today?<br>
&lt;argyle> astearns: proposed is to take the api shape in the linekd comment and add properties to the animation interface along timeline<br>
&lt;bramus> SGTM<br>
&lt;argyle> astearns: any objections to the propsoed resolution?<br>
&lt;argyle> astearns: hearing none, we are resolved<br>
&lt;argyle> RESOLVE: take the api shape int he linked comments and add properties to the animation interface along timeline<br>
&lt;argyle> RESOLVEd: take the api shape int he linked comments and add properties to the animation interface along timeline<br>
&lt;argyle> RESOLVED: take the api shape int he linked comments and add properties to the animation interface along timeline<br>
&lt;argyle> astearns: anything more on this one?<br>
</details>


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7589#issuecomment-1412415513 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Wednesday, 1 February 2023 17:11:01 UTC