- From: Lea Verou via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2023 23:44:27 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> I believe, the main advantage of option 1 besides reusing existing syntax is that it allows mixing smooth gradients and stripes. This is not possible with the other options. That is an excellent point. Composability FTW. I think I'm now *strongly* in favor of Option 1. > 1. Add `<1d-image>` to existing gradient functions > [...] > Cons > [...] > - Semantically incorrect What if we call it `bands()` instead of `stripes()`? Then it doesn't seem that incorrect inside gradients… -- GitHub Notification of comment by LeaVerou Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7244#issuecomment-1694524069 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Saturday, 26 August 2023 23:44:30 UTC