- From: Lea Verou via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2023 16:25:41 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> That's not at all guaranteed. "It works in the spec" doesn't mean we get the implementation for free - see all the bugs where browsers still don't support calc() in various spots that take a numeric value. > > Skipping a little spec work isn't a great argument to organize something a particular way, especially if that implies a suboptimal authoring syntax (nested functions). I'm also not sure how likely a second 1d-image even _is_. Not sure if this is in reply to me, but I'm not talking about spec work at all, I'm talking about the author facing syntax. -- GitHub Notification of comment by LeaVerou Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7244#issuecomment-1694402747 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Saturday, 26 August 2023 16:25:43 UTC