- From: jfkthame via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 11:22:41 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Just FTR, I noticed when re-reading the [spec for `font-variant-position`](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-fonts-4/#font-variant-position-prop) that there is already text that requires: > In the case of OpenType fonts that lack subscript or superscript glyphs for a given character, user agents _must_ synthesize appropriate subscript and superscript glyphs. which means the existing implementations that don't synthesis are actually non-compliant. (In Gecko bug https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1849010, I'm currently implementing `font-synthesis-position`, and as part of adding tests for that, I'll include a test to verify that UAs do synthesis when required.) -- GitHub Notification of comment by jfkthame Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7441#issuecomment-1682113805 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 17 August 2023 11:22:44 UTC