- From: jsnkuhn via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2023 21:59:06 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
jsnkuhn has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts: == [css-borders] `corner-shape` `border-radius` interaction == This is another off shoot from the use case thread 1. Currently spec has `border-radius` as a forced fallback to `corner-shape`. Personally, not a fan of this. If a page/component design requires an angled corner it might also have things like background images that contain angles. Forcing a rounded corner fallback in this case could cause design inconsistencies. A fallback to no corner shaping makes more sense. In practice a better fall back here would probably be using @supports and adding a background-image or a clip path to approximate the wanted angled corner. 2. The idea of using `border-radius` on top of `corner-shape` to optionally round corner joints has been brought up: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6980#issuecomment-1221512890 example image:  https://drafts.csswg.org/css-borders-4/#corners Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9188 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Monday, 14 August 2023 21:59:08 UTC