- From: Sebastian Zartner via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2023 21:52:46 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
In #4706 it was [resolved](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4706#issuecomment-622174548) to _not_ add a `background-opacity` property (neither a `background-filter` property) because this effect and more can already be achieved via the [`filter()` function defined in Filter Effects 1](https://drafts.fxtf.org/filter-effects-1/#funcdef-filter).
An example for that function used with backgrounds looks like this:
```css
background-image: filter(url('image.jpg'), opacity(30%));
```
Furthermore, in #6807 it was [resolved to add an `@image`](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6807#issuecomment-1248380039) rule allowing arbitrary image manipulations.
@HT-7 Does this work for you?
Sebastian
--
GitHub Notification of comment by SebastianZ
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4996#issuecomment-1676115082 using your GitHub account
--
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Saturday, 12 August 2023 21:52:48 UTC