- From: Guillaume via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2023 12:17:19 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
cdoublev has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts: == [css-regions-1] `flow-into` and `flow-from` should exclude all CSS-wide keywords == [`flow-into`](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-regions-1/#propdef-flow-into) is defined with `none | <ident> [element | content]?` and `<ident>` excludes `none`, `inherit`, `default`, `auto`, `initial`. [`flow-from`](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-regions-1/#flow-from) is defined with `<ident> | none` and does not exclude CSS-wide keywords. I suspect `<ident>` should be `<custom-ident>` in both properties. --- **The more important underlying question I have is:** should a CSS parser give priority to the grammar of CSS-wide keywords, property substitution values, or of the property value definition? Related: #8731 Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9160 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 4 August 2023 12:17:21 UTC