- From: Yehonatan Daniv via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2023 11:07:22 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
@andruud you mean @fantasai's comment: > I'm not super against using a separate property to declare a scope, but having a handshake like this reduces conflicts like some other element defining timeline with the same name and expecting it to bind locally. It also allows for recursion, which re-using the same property doesn't. ? I guess I'm less concerned with this, having clashing names. Since `scroll-timeline` is a list, authors could specify another timeline for local attachment with a different name on the same element. And if a clashing name happens by mistake then I expect things to break, isn't it why it's called `-ident` after all? I mean, IMHO, I expect that using same identity twice should fail, instead of allowing an explicit mechanism that prevents it. -- GitHub Notification of comment by ydaniv Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7759#issuecomment-1523235430 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 26 April 2023 11:07:23 UTC