- From: Robert Flack via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2023 15:37:41 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> which invalidates their connections with any descendants referring to their timeline in their otherwise happy little subtree bubble. :/ I think each named timeline could still implicitly serve as a local root for that name as well as the selected timeline for the ancestor declared name if one existed. This would allow descendants to continue to be valid and use the same timeline in their happy subtree bubble. The downside is that without the double handshake you would still be contaminating the ancestor timeline namespace with a timeline that was only intended to be used in its subtree - which a developer could avoid by making the subtree also an explicit timeline root for the name. -- GitHub Notification of comment by flackr Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7759#issuecomment-1520406239 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Monday, 24 April 2023 15:37:43 UTC