- From: Rune Lillesveen via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2023 09:09:46 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
@cdoublev Good catch, and it makes a difference because it decides whether these cases evaluate to `false` or `unknown`: ``` style(specced-but-not-implemented-property) style(color: 1px) style(color: specced-but-not-implemented-value) ``` How about reverting the syntax change and instead change the prose to something like: "The syntax of a `<style-feature>` is either a valid declaration or a supported property name" That would result in all of the style() queries in the block above to fall back to `<general-enclosed>` and evaluate to `unknown`. Does that look reasonable? -- GitHub Notification of comment by lilles Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8127#issuecomment-1517522463 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 21 April 2023 09:09:48 UTC