- From: CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2023 16:25:32 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
The CSS Working Group just discussed `[cssom-view] checkVisibility and filter:opacity(0)`, and agreed to the following: * `RESOLVED: close issue with no change` <details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary> <emeyer> vmpstr: We’ve added `check-visibility()` which considers a few styles like opacity<br> <TabAtkins> q+<br> <emeyer> …If we’re considering that, why aren’t we considering `filter` opacity 0?<br> <emeyer> …It’s hard to do this, and it was commented if we have other filters that make things invisible<br> <emeyer> …I propose to close with no change<br> <astearns> ack TabAtkins<br> <emeyer> TabAtkins: I concur<br> <fantasai> +1 to close no change<br> <dbaron> +1<br> <emeyer> astearns: Any concerns here?<br> <emeyer> RESOLVED: close issue with no change<br> </details> -- GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7795#issuecomment-1515030307 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 19 April 2023 16:25:34 UTC