- From: Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2023 19:43:50 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I don't have a strong opinion on this, but it sounds reasonable, and the proposal itself seems right. > I think I'd slightly favor background-layer for consistency, since the common case is one layer. Right, name-wise we almost never do plurals, so it would be `background-layer`. > but it should still expand to the full list of 9 longhands. Yeah, it would be a separate shorthand, unrelated to the `background` shorthand. -- GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8726#issuecomment-1511982654 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Monday, 17 April 2023 19:43:52 UTC