- From: Alan Stearns via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 19:31:46 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Summarizing the resolution and discussion: There are several minor issues with a SASS-style syntax for nesting we have identified so far. They include Issues with error-recovery Restrictions on future-syntax Using SASS-like syntax, but not matching some SASS behavior Parsing changes are risky Unintuitive cascading behavior when declarations come after rules We had consensus in the breakout session that even considering all of these issues together, we still plan on pursuing the SASS-style syntax. Working on solutions to these issues (where possible) will happen in separate issues. But if there is anyone that was not in the breakout session who finds this set of issues a compelling reason to change course and NOT pursue SASS-style syntax, please do speak up here. And when new issues arise, we should take a moment to add them to what remains in this list as a checkpoint to reconsider whether the mass of minor issues has become too large. -- GitHub Notification of comment by astearns Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8249#issuecomment-1505814708 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 12 April 2023 19:31:47 UTC