- From: Krzysztof Maczyński via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2023 22:22:35 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> What if we treated nesting as parse-time syntactic sugar and always generated the CSSOM in the un-nested form? How about both? I.e. have the CSSOM contain the nested and unnested versions. > Then it would be trivial to have a combinatorial explosion. Somewhat like what's described in https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8310#issuecomment-1383810771. But the internal representation can still be succint. -- GitHub Notification of comment by ByteEater-pl Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8698#issuecomment-1502410287 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Monday, 10 April 2023 22:22:37 UTC