- From: Lea Verou via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2023 11:56:45 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> So I'm curious, if we specify option 3 behavior in level 1, how will that spec ever exit CR? Do we really think we're going to get two implementations of that, but _without_ look-ahead and actually requiring the `&` for type selectors? > > I don't see a point in making a spec that can never exit CR. Agreed with this, the momentum seems to already be for the lookahead version, so I'd vote for switching the spec to that. -- GitHub Notification of comment by LeaVerou Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7961#issuecomment-1501733050 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Monday, 10 April 2023 11:56:47 UTC