- From: Yehonatan Daniv via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 02 Apr 2023 15:57:47 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Thanks @fantasai, I'd like to offer another option for omitted name. Since the complete timeline interval is represented by `cover` we may consider treating a `<percentage>` with omitted names as `cover <percentage>`. So that `entry 60% 50%` becomes `entry 60% cover 50%`. Of course this could also lead into an invalid timeline in case of `end > start`, but I think that's fine. WDYT? (@flackr @bramus) @cdoublev your change suggestion above seems correct. -- GitHub Notification of comment by ydaniv Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8438#issuecomment-1493378658 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Sunday, 2 April 2023 15:57:48 UTC