- From: CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 16:49:05 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
The CSS Working Group just discussed `flex-container baselines with wrap-reverse`. <details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary> <TabAtkins> Topic: flex-container baselines with wrap-reverse<br> <TabAtkins> iank_: Similar to the alst, but I don't think this is in the spec currently<br> <TabAtkins> iank_: You can have flex: row wrap-reverse, so the lines are inverted<br> <TabAtkins> iank_: Currently impls will take the last baseline from the visually last line<br> <TabAtkins> fantasai: I think this is basically the same as the previous, and the spec says "startmost" or "endmost", so that's alreayd in spec<br> <fantasai> TabAtkins: startmost and endmost have strict meanings<br> <orieo1> 💨Don’t miss this chance to be Rich... (full message at <https://matrix.org/_matrix/media/r0/download/matrix.org/iVDFyerjTozOQZwEdsBFmdRm>)<br> <fantasai> https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/995<br> <TabAtkins> fantasai: actually I think it's somewhat unclear, "start" is a little ambiguous with "flex-start" in Flexbox<br> <TabAtkins> fantasai: So we should do some clarifying edits<br> <TabAtkins> fantasai: But yeah, if we're accounting for flex-direction we should absolutely do flex-wrap as well<br> <TabAtkins> fantasai: they're together<br> <TabAtkins> fantasai: So we should make sure the spec is clear about this<br> <TabAtkins> fantasai: Might have forgotten to clarify that it was a flex vs writing mode<br> <TabAtkins> fantasai: I think it's clear that you do both of them with the same set of directions, the spec just isn't entirely clear that you should be using writing-mode order rather than flex order<br> <fantasai> "RESOLVED: take the visually first line when considering baseline alignment in flexboxes"<br> <fantasai> from the issue<br> <TabAtkins> (I disagree and think it's correct as is, but am fine with making it more explicit)<br> </details> -- GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7774#issuecomment-1261180203 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 28 September 2022 16:49:07 UTC