- From: fantasai via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 06:42:01 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Hi @jakearchibald! I love the thought that you put into this. It's maybe obvious, but I'm missing why ::view(header) and ::view-image-group(header) are two different elements? Can we combine them? I agree with @SebastianZ that we seem to have lost the transition aspect of the names, and maybe that's worth keeping somehow. If you want to use pseudo-element structure to represent the nesting, maybe something like: ``` ::transition /* root */ ::transition::view(header) /* group */ ::transition::view(header)::old /* outgoing image */ ::transition::view(header)::new /* incoming image */ ``` If not, then collapsing down the names: ``` ::transition ::transition-view(header) ::transition-view-old(header) ::transition-view-new(header) ``` -- GitHub Notification of comment by fantasai Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7788#issuecomment-1260458160 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 28 September 2022 06:42:03 UTC