- From: Oriol Brufau via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2022 17:45:37 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
OK, I guess you might be arguing that the condition of skipping the contents could be replaced with having a non-`visible` `content-visibility`? So, the answer of "If the element has size containment, should it use the last remembered size?" is: | | Nothing else causing<br>size containment | `contain: size`<br>or similar | | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | | `content-visibility: visible` | - | No | | `content-visibility: auto` not skipping contents | - | No | | `content-visibility: auto` skipping contents | Yes | Yes | | `content-visibility: hidden` | Yes | Yes | And it would become: | | Nothing else causing<br>size containment | `contain: size`<br>or similar | | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | | `content-visibility: visible` | - | No | | `content-visibility: auto` not skipping contents | - | Yes | | `content-visibility: auto` skipping contents | Yes | Yes | | `content-visibility: hidden` | Yes | Yes | I don't think it matters much in practice since `contain: size` or similar will prevent storing the last remembered size in the 1st place, so only observable if you are setting it dynamically. -- GitHub Notification of comment by Loirooriol Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7769#issuecomment-1254030082 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 21 September 2022 17:45:39 UTC