- From: Bramus! via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2022 12:14:55 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> I strongly agree with @chriskirknielsen that if such a shorthand is introduced, it still needs to be based on the `@property` rule. Without that info it is unclear what's defined by that rule. +1 > So, either a separator _not_ allowed in `<declaration-value>` would need to be used or the shorthand would have to be restricted to `@property <custom-property-name> <custom-property-syntax> <custom-property-initial-value>;`. What about `@property <custom-property-name>+ <custom-property-syntax> <custom-property-initial-value>;`? That would allow definition of multiple custom properties in one go ```css @property --min --max --avg number 0; ``` -- GitHub Notification of comment by bramus Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7523#issuecomment-1245327776 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 13 September 2022 12:14:58 UTC