- From: Ibby Wedin via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2022 06:25:40 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Technically it would expand to the former, but because the `:--granny` inside the `:is` is a less selective version of the `:--granny:not(.c)` outside the `:is`, the two are equivalent in this case (except for specificity). That is, the pattern I outlined was designed specifically to produce roughly that outcome. You could instead do all sorts of wacky things that don't simplify to something so intuitive. `:not(:--granny) &` is a fun bit of nonsense to chew on, but I'm sure other possibilities are actually useful. -- GitHub Notification of comment by WCWedin Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6977#issuecomment-1244955757 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 13 September 2022 06:25:42 UTC