Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-transitions-1] transition-property and transition shorthand conflict on whether none can be listed (#2031)

Did you missed the `transition` prose for this rule?

> If there is more than one `<single-transition>` in the shorthand, and any of the transitions has `none` as the `<single-transition-property>`, then the declaration is invalid.

Or do you mean that this rule should be hard coded in its value definition, eg.:

> **Name:** transition 
> **Value:** `<single-transition> [ , [<single-transition-property> || <time> || <easing-function> || <time>]# ]?`
>
> `<single-transition> = <'transition-property'> || <time> || <easing-function> || <time>`

Obviously it would be less confusing to rename `<single-transition-property>`.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by cdoublev
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2031#issuecomment-1240582276 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Thursday, 8 September 2022 11:21:33 UTC