Re: [csswg-drafts] [selectors] The forgiving nature of :has breaks jQuery when used with a complex :has selector (#7676) from Michał Gołębiowski-Owczarek via GitHub on 2022-09-07 (public-css-archive@w3.org from September 2022)

From: Michał Gołębiowski-Owczarek via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2022 09:00:30 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-1239110428-1662541227-sysbot+gh@w3.org>

@SelenIT 
> @mgol isn't `:not` available in `:has`? The spec apparently suggests it's allowed (see Example 15). Are there any extra implementation-specific limitations?

You are right. What's not supported natively is nested `:has()`, `:not()` in `:has()` seems fine.

I updated the comment.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by mgol
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7676#issuecomment-1239110428 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Wednesday, 7 September 2022 09:00:36 UTC