- From: Brad Kemper via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2022 17:39:13 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
This is just my opinion, but I would say both. For the purposes of determining whether there is an implicit `&` (but still basing specificity on the most specific part), it would be as though that was divided into two rules, like this:
```
:is(.bar) {...}
:is(&) {...}
```
So then, this:
```
& :is(.bar) {...}
:is(&) {...}
```
--
GitHub Notification of comment by bradkemper
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7972#issuecomment-1295913658 using your GitHub account
--
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Saturday, 29 October 2022 17:39:15 UTC