- From: orstavik via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 09:10:47 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
orstavik has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts: == [css-contain-3] Should not cq units be interpreted in the flatDom context? == It looks like the `cqw` value is interpreted within the logical Dom context, and **not** the flatDom context. And this behavior seems to differ from the behavior of at least two other relative css units: `%` and `em`. Here is a test that illustrate the issue (only a single line of code is different in the three tests): https://jsfiddle.net/0hfnpumq/1/ https://jsfiddle.net/0hfnpumq/2/ https://jsfiddle.net/0hfnpumq/3/ Have I misunderstood something here? Or is this expected behavior? Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7947 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Monday, 24 October 2022 09:10:49 UTC