- From: vmpstr via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 18:11:59 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> I continue to object to the idea that calling the images "images" is somehow confusing.
The plurality of the name is confusing to me. This is referring to a single element, which indeed is a container of images, but it's a container (singular), it's not images. When I'm selecting this element, and I have `view-transition-images(...) { ... }` I know that this is a single element, because I worked on this feature :) but if I didn't, I don't know if this is some sort of magic CSS to select all constituent images.
To draw a contrived analogy, it's kind of like instead of `<ol>` calling it `<ordereditems>`. It isn't items, it's a list (singular) of items and when selecting `ol { }` i'm selecting a single container element vs `ordereditems { }` selecting seemingly multiple items
Personally, I don't have any objections to using the word "image", but I want this to be something like `image-group` or `image-list`, not `images`
--
GitHub Notification of comment by vmpstr
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7788#issuecomment-1287287793 using your GitHub account
--
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 21 October 2022 18:12:01 UTC