- From: Romain Menke via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 15:45:47 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Yes, but your comment hints at a larger change.
```css
.parent .a, .other-parent .b::before {
.c > & {
color: black
}
}
```
currently matches like :
```css
.c > :is(.parent .a), .c > :is(.other-parent .b::before) {
color: black
}
```
Which is also why I agree with @tabatkins to keep these linked.
Resolving this issue for both nesting and `:is()` at the same time is the least confusing.
--
GitHub Notification of comment by romainmenke
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7433#issuecomment-1287142775 using your GitHub account
--
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 21 October 2022 15:45:48 UTC