- From: Lea Verou via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 05:14:00 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> I do not support this, as I could easily imagine future non-ident rules that should work differently. Ones that immediately come to mind are [`@if`](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5624) and [`@extend`](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1855), and possibly some future version of `@apply`. My understanding (@tabatkins can confirm) is that these kinds of things would be fine, since the @-rule would be thrown away right now, as it's invalid, and since in proposal 3 these are not used as a parsing switch there are no side effects after the @-rule. -- GitHub Notification of comment by LeaVerou Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7834#issuecomment-1283440887 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 19 October 2022 05:14:02 UTC