- From: Romain Menke via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2022 21:37:26 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> > So both of these would valid in (2) :
> Oh sorry, no, I was referring to just the no-op @nest;. @nest <selector> {...} is only part of (1).
I can follow that.
_If `@nest {}` blocks were still part of (3) then code that was authored for (1) would still be valid and have the same meaning. But I think we can provide an automated one-time migration from proposal 1 to proposal 3. (None of this is relevant to which proposal is better)_
--
GitHub Notification of comment by romainmenke
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7834#issuecomment-1283034104 using your GitHub account
--
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 18 October 2022 21:37:28 UTC