- From: fantasai via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2022 16:51:26 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
@LeaVerou mentioned that @FremyCompany's proposal would mean the CSSOM and syntax would diverge, since the rules would be nested inside the style rule representation but be in a separate rule... but I think it makes sense to think of it not as a separate rule, but as giving a style rule an optional second block. Conceptually, style rules would now have three parts: - a selector - a declaration block - a style rule block (optional) Using bare braces makes this association between the selector and the second block clearer than using `@nest`; I think it's reasonably consistent with the desired CSSOM structure. -- GitHub Notification of comment by fantasai Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7834#issuecomment-1282700284 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 18 October 2022 16:51:28 UTC