- From: Sofi Valitova via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2022 17:51:38 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I very like that idea 😍 Even more because it is strongly typed. But there is one thing I don't like. This code... ``` --some-shorthand: green 10px block; ``` ... looks like definition, not like applying. I like the way how it's made in Less. With an `@includes` property with a list of "mixins" names in the value. It looks more like 'apply this mixims to this block' than 'there i define a new value for this mixin'. I don't know if CSS let property be named from the symbol `@`, and do it need to be called `includes`, but i think there needs at least a new property for it) -- GitHub Notification of comment by ariarzer Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7879#issuecomment-1279298934 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 14 October 2022 17:51:40 UTC