- From: CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2022 16:55:30 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
The CSS Working Group just discussed `:open or :top-layer pseudo`, and agreed to the following: * `RESOLVED: Accept :open and :closed with definitions as proposed by TabAtkins` <details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary> <fantasai> Topic: :open or :top-layer pseudo<br> <fantasai> github: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7319#issuecomment-1242377579<br> <fantasai> TabAtkins: We've talked about this topic before, last time we did the name :open seemed to be prefered<br> <fantasai> TabAtkins: we wanted a strict definition before resolving<br> <fantasai> TabAtkins: so I drafted one, see comment<br> <fantasai> TabAtkins: [reads comment]<br> <fantasai> TabAtkins: secondary question, do we want a :closed pseudo-element<br> <fantasai> TabAtkins: because :not(:open) selects all elements not just openable<br> <fantasai> TabAtkins: First question is, should we resolve to add :open with this definition?<br> <tantek> SGTM and +1 to :closed<br> <masonf> q?<br> <flackr> +1 to both<br> <fantasai> TabAtkins: second, do we want to add :closed<br> <fantasai> +1 to both<br> <Rossen_> q?<br> <masonf> +1 to both<br> <fantasai> Rossen_: +1 to both<br> <fantasai> TabAtkins: There's also a comment from annevk about asking ":shown", and masonf replied that it would be less confusing to use :open<br> <masonf> q+<br> <PaulG> +1 to both<br> <ydaniv> how will :closed match differently from :not(:open)?<br> <fantasai> TabAtkins: I agree with masonf's comment<br> <tantek> agreed, open/closed sound more semantic than shown/hidden. also "hidden" already has a different meaning in CSS<br> <flackr> +1<br> <fantasai> [see https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7319#issuecomment-1274745594 ]<br> <fantasai> plinss: [something JavaScript]<br> <fantasai> TabAtkins: Only elements that have a notion of open and closed can match :closed<br> <fantasai> TabAtkins: similar to :playing :paused, can only match elements that have that notion<br> <fantasai> Rossen_: anything else?<br> <plinss> s/[something JavaScript]/:open also matches the .open property<br> <fantasai> Rossen_: objections?<br> <fantasai> RESOLVED: Accept :open and :closed with definitions as proposed by TabAtkins<br> </details> -- GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7319#issuecomment-1276473056 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 12 October 2022 16:55:31 UTC