- From: Brad Kemper via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2022 05:42:25 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> Maybe I am alone in thinking that the more verbose syntax of the current draft is actually a good feature :) But you could still be that verbose if you want to. You could still proceed each rule with an `&`. You just wouldn't need `@nest` at the beginning of the ones with an `&` somewhere else in the rule, unless it was the first rule after any declarations. And actually, you could still write @nest multiple times and in multiple places between rules if you wanted to (switching to a mode you are already in). So I don't see why you couldn't write it in the previous sustains if you wanted, and it should still parse the same, I think. This also means you could write the rules in a SASS compatible way. -- GitHub Notification of comment by bradkemper Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7834#issuecomment-1269351536 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 6 October 2022 05:42:27 UTC