- From: Myles C. Maxfield via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2022 05:38:26 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
litherum has just submitted a new pull request for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts: == [css-fonts-4] Give clearer advice to authors about font-feature-settings and font-variation-settings == This patch does a few things: 1. Fixes a small handful of whitespace / typo problems 2. Adds an example showing how the font-weight descriptor can accept a range 3. Advises authors to use high-level font-variant properties instead of font-feature-settings 4. Rewrites an example to follow the above advice 5. Advises authors to use high-level font properties instead of font-variation-settings This patch isn't quite ready to land; there's a problem where a `<ol>` and a `<table>` inside a `<p class="advisement">` do not actually end up in the advisement box in the rendered content. @tabatkins do you know how to fix this? cc (@PeterConstable) via https://twitter.com/pgconstable/status/1575526680076357633 See https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/7815 -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Saturday, 1 October 2022 05:38:28 UTC