- From: Romain Menke via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 19:11:57 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> do we have a path forward to organize non-biased survey I think the bigger issue is author preconception. The last survey result was basically : "we want what we have in Sass or as close to that as possible" The option that best fit that description was option 1 in that survey. @LeaVerou's Twitter polls again confirmed that authors want nesting to be as terse and relaxed as possible. If the concern is to pick the right syntax for the future regardless of what preprocessors have done in the past then I don't think another author survey will be helpful. Authors will pick proposal 3. I don't think it is possible to design a survey for todays authors that will have a different outcome. ---- I personally would be fine with proposal 1, 3 or even 5. But I am part of the minority that likes to read/write `&` and `@nest`. -- GitHub Notification of comment by romainmenke Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7970#issuecomment-1332615468 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 30 November 2022 19:12:02 UTC