- From: Guillaume via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 08:45:11 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Changing the title to broaden the topic with the following cases:
```css
type { &type {} }
.subclass { &type {} }
```
The first can only be invalid, even when expanded using `:is()`.
The latter would be valid only if it is expanded using `:is()`.
> The nesting selector can be desugared by replacing it with the parent style rule’s selector, wrapped in an `:is()` selector.
This currently appear in a note. Maybe it should be normative?
--
GitHub Notification of comment by cdoublev
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7503#issuecomment-1330281289 using your GitHub account
--
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 29 November 2022 08:45:18 UTC