- From: Robert Flack via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2022 14:26:51 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Thanks for the review! > @flackr Is this right? If you cancel an animation associated with a scroll-driven timeline do we really want its effect to be treated as current? No. Not if canceled. But we do want newly started scroll timelines or scroll timelines which are still playing associated with a scrolling box which isn't currently scrollable to still be treated as current. Looking back at what happens, a played scroll linked animation is given a start time so it will not be idle, unlike a canceled animation so I've included this in the requirements. > (Also, I guess we should make it clear that an animation without a timeline does not count as an animation "with an associated timeline that is not monotonically increasing" because I think in some cases we tend to think of the animation as being associated with a null timeline in that case.) Agreed. Added non-null timeline. -- GitHub Notification of comment by flackr Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/8089#issuecomment-1322143823 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Monday, 21 November 2022 14:26:53 UTC