- From: Robert Flack via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2022 16:57:23 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> What about not allowing `all` or any shorthand to ever match discrete properties but still creating transitions for them (using the behavior from option 1) if they are explicitly listed? e.g. `transition-property: all, overflow-x`? @birtles I like the idea of having `transition: all` match everything that is animatable and not discrete, and allowing developers to explicitly specify discrete properties if they want them to participate in transitions. > The other option that comes to mind is simply to add extra syntax for this, be it an extra property (`transition-property-set: discrete-too`) or extra syntax attached to property names. I think that having `discrete` as something that could be specified in addition to all would be nice. Thinking about this I'm realizing developers could also use transition events as a way to detect style changes. Not sure if this is an explicit use case we should support but it's interesting to think about what people might do with that. -- GitHub Notification of comment by flackr Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4441#issuecomment-1321183678 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Sunday, 20 November 2022 16:57:25 UTC