Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-1] content-visibility: auto elements are relevant to the user during a transition (#7874)

The CSS Working Group just discussed `[css-view-transitions-1] content-visibility: auto elements are relevant to the user during a transition`, and agreed to the following:

* `RESOLVED: elements under content-visiblity:auto element that skip its contents are not eligible to participate in view transition`

<details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary>
&lt;fantasai> Topic: [css-view-transitions-1] content-visibility: auto elements are relevant to the user during a transition<br>
&lt;fantasai> github: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7874<br>
&lt;fantasai> vmpstr: content-visibility: autho  not user relevant, they don't update rendering, so we can't tell if they've been tagged with a view transition name<br>
&lt;flackr> q+<br>
&lt;fantasai> vmpstr: so we'd like to say that such elements that are not relevant to the user can't participate in the view transition because they're far enough offscreen<br>
&lt;fantasai> flackr: my preference was element can participate, because could move on screen, but none of its descendants<br>
&lt;fantasai> vmpstr: sorry, meant the subtree elements cannot be detected as participating in this transition<br>
&lt;Rossen_> ack flackr<br>
&lt;fantasai> vmpstr: content-visiblity: auto only affects content<br>
&lt;fantasai> flackr: with that correct, good with that<br>
&lt;fantasai> Rossen_: proposal?<br>
&lt;fantasai> vmpstr: elements under content-visiblity:auto element that skip its contents cannot be discovered as participating in view transition<br>
&lt;flackr> +1<br>
&lt;fantasai> s/cannot/are not eligible to be/<br>
&lt;fantasai> florian: seems reasonable<br>
&lt;fantasai> +1<br>
&lt;fantasai> Rossen_: objections to resolving on that edited proposal?<br>
&lt;fantasai> RESOLVED: elements under content-visiblity:auto element that skip its contents are not eligible to participate in view transition<br>
</details>


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7874#issuecomment-1309141936 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Wednesday, 9 November 2022 17:59:49 UTC