- From: Nauris Pūķis via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2022 16:37:49 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> Exactly my point. This was pushed through, despite significant pushback, by a few members of the working group with very strong opinions. > > > > I'll back out of the discussion now because it doesn't seem to be going anywhere, but I am disappointed by the process here. This is why I don't even attempt to participate in the discussion. If Scss syntax can't be used, I don't care what the outcome is, I'll still use a preprocessor anyway. If efficiency is what browsers care about, maybe a new "efficient syntax" needs to be created instead and we should all use prepeocessor of choice to compile to that. -- GitHub Notification of comment by pyronaur Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7834#issuecomment-1309031782 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 9 November 2022 16:37:50 UTC