- From: Nigel Megitt via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2022 09:28:58 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Both these solutions are slightly missing the point, that fonts don't have a `unicode-range`, only `@font-face` rules do. Nevertheless, there _is_ some applicable set of code points associated with each available font, and it's _that_ which we should reference. I'm neutral on whether we should care about an actual glyph being present at U+0020, but for computation of line height, we clearly do need to care that the font defines some size in the block progression direction that can be used. -- GitHub Notification of comment by nigelmegitt Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4796#issuecomment-1305328754 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Monday, 7 November 2022 09:29:04 UTC