Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-fonts] Reconsider the definition of "first available font" (#4796)

Thanks @jfkthame, good to know we agree on the intent. My concern is more definitional: fonts simply do not have a `unicode-range` as defined; only `@font-face` rules have that descriptor. I agree that the UA has access to the set of unicode points that each available font claims to support, but that's a _different thing_ to `unicode-range`, as things are defined today, is it not?

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by nigelmegitt
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4796#issuecomment-1303794461 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Friday, 4 November 2022 15:52:10 UTC