- From: Miriam Suzanne via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2022 00:20:41 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I'll note that our suggestion doesn't rely specifically on the specific mapping of class/element syntax, but that provides a good example. Whatever the selector-syntax mapping (@FremyCompany's suggestion of IDs might make more sense), the goal is just to allow compound/complex selectors in the function.
One reason for that might be exposing the hierarchy. The more important goal in my mind was the ability to differentiate what happens in these three instances:
1. There is _only a `new` image_.
2. There is _only an `old` image_.
3. There are _both `old` and `new` images_.
The solution mentioned a few times for that is using `:only-child`/:not(:only-child)` on the element in question. I assume that solution is also possible with the current proposal as well?
```css
html::view-transition-old(*):only-child {
/* this is a default exit animation */
}
```
--
GitHub Notification of comment by mirisuzanne
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7788#issuecomment-1301515920 using your GitHub account
--
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 3 November 2022 00:20:43 UTC