- From: Steinar H. Gunderson via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2022 10:41:02 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> I opened this issue because I think there is some ambiguity between the wording and the intention. (I might be wrong about that.) I honestly don't know. I don't find any of this behavior intuitive, but I've been told it is if I only knew Sass. :-) I guess my best explanation here is that `::before` is equivalent to `*::before`, and I don't think anyone would say that `*::before` should be the same as `&::before`, but rather `& *::before`. -- GitHub Notification of comment by sesse Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7979#issuecomment-1298337348 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 1 November 2022 10:41:04 UTC