- From: Ian Kilpatrick via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 23:00:29 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
David and I chatted quickly about this case today. @fantasai am I correct in assuming that your preferred behaviour here is: - The static-pos rectangle for an abspos is the flexbox's content-box. - (and `align-self` / `justify-self` apply as described in css-align-3). - Then I'm confused about the desired behaviour for `align-content` and `justify-content` is it to: - Ignore `align-content` / `justify-content` for abspos (as the static-position rect can't "shift" for a flexbox). - Or to treat `justify-conent` similar to how flexbox is doing it today, but applied like `align-self`/`justify-self` in css-align-3? (ignoring `align-content`). Ian -- GitHub Notification of comment by bfgeek Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5843#issuecomment-1136513446 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 24 May 2022 23:00:30 UTC