Re: [csswg-drafts] [cssom-view] isVisible inert option (#7274)

The CSS Working Group just discussed `[cssom-view] isVisible inert option`.

<details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary>
&lt;dbaron> Topic: [cssom-view] isVisible inert option<br>
&lt;dbaron> github: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7274<br>
&lt;dbaron> vmpstr: We have recently added an isVisible function to Element.  It takes a dictionary of additional options.  One of those options was about inert-ness.<br>
&lt;dbaron> vmpstr: Mozilla indicated that checking for inertness was a strange thing to correlate with visibility.  So we'd like to remove this dictionary option, at least for now.<br>
&lt;dbaron> vmpstr: It's easier to add it later if people actually want this than to remove.<br>
&lt;Rossen_> q?<br>
&lt;dbaron> Rossen: I'm assuming this is relatively safe at this point?<br>
&lt;dbaron> vmpstr: I'm not aware of implementations.<br>
&lt;dbaron> Rossen: Did you consider oriol's question?<br>
&lt;dbaron> vmpstr: ... with aria-hidden?  Rereading it now.<br>
&lt;dbaron> vmpstr: It's a good question, but we'd like to begin by shipping isVisible as a somewhat non-controversial set of options... questions such as these can be raised to add additional dictionary options if there are developers who want to check these things.<br>
&lt;chrishtr> +1 to removing<br>
&lt;dbaron> Rossen: Any objections to dropping dictionary for now?<br>
&lt;dbaron> vmpstr: Just dropping the inert-ness member from the dictionary.<br>
&lt;dbaron> Resolution: Remove checkInert from IsVisibleOptions.<br>
&lt;dbaron> Rossen: And hopefully oriol will get back to us if he has something to raise.<br>
</details>


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7274#issuecomment-1130214343 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Wednesday, 18 May 2022 16:10:15 UTC