- From: Philip Rogers via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 17 May 2022 21:56:25 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> I'm a little worried that putting the key bit about flooring in the single word "positive" might hide it from many readers. I think it's still worth having two separate clauses to mention the round-to-nearest-device-pixel behavior and the minimum-of-one-device-pixel behavior. > I defer to David about the best way to phrase spec language for clarity, so I'm okay with switching back to the two-clause approach. Re: mentioning "device pixels". The Chrome implementation doesn't generally have access to pixel snapping at this place in the pipeline. As an example, would spec language referring to pixel snapping here require that we re-snap every frame when under a scale transform animation? -- GitHub Notification of comment by progers Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/7284#issuecomment-1129354642 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 17 May 2022 21:56:26 UTC